-
FOR Communication 20/2019: Transparency of National Council of the Judiciary elections: 7 to 0 for the citizens | 2019-05-27
moreOn 27 May 2019, the seventh verdict in favour of transparency was passed. The Provincial Administrative Court in Warsaw ruled that the President of the Supreme Administrative Court had no right to refuse the disclosure of the names of judges from the administrative courts who supported candidates for the new NCJ.
-
FOR Communication 19/2019: Poles vote with their feet for economic freedom | 2019-05-02
morePoles have been emigrating to the West since the 18th century in search of more extensive opportunities for self-fulfillment, which not only creates the prosperity of the local societies, but also, usually, a greater degree of freedom. After Poland's accession to the European Union, those who left chose some of the most economically free countries in Europe and the world - Great Britain, Germany, Ireland and the Netherlands.
-
FOR Communication 18/2019: How much money do we have from work? | 2019-05-01
moreThe non-financial corporate sector is the heart of the Polish economy, where over 70% of the Polish GDP is generated. In 2017, a person working in the sector of non-financial enterprises produced goods and services worth PLN 9.7 thousand on average monthly, but their net remuneration amounted to only PLN 3.1 thousand. What happened to the remaining PLN 6.6 thousand?
-
FOR Communication 17/2019: Alcohol, cigarettes, food and beverages - Poland is more restrictive than Germany and the Czech Republic | 2019-04-30
morePaternalistic regulations harm consumers in the first place, leading to higher prices (e.g. through higher taxes), stigmatisation of some consumers, restriction of freedom of choice, inconvenience in shopping (e.g. as a result of limited days and hours of sale), poorer access to information (e.g. as a result of advertising bans) or deterioration in the quality of products.
-
FOR Communication 15/2019: The Kaczynski noose around the taxpayer's neck | 2019-04-25
moreThe costs of Kaczyński's Five promises accumulate with the costs of previously announced government programmes, forcing tax increases and reductions in other expenditures, primarily on public services. Despite the high costs, the new programmes do not solve any significant problems, and are focused primarily on the electoral effect.
-
FOR Communication 14/2019: Ministerial assessment of the trade ban: unreliable, biased and anti-entrepreneurial | 2019-04-18
moreThe Ministry of Business and Technology has provided an Impact Assessment of the restriction of trade on Sundays. The ministry does not recommend changes in the model of reaching a full ban, suggesting only a modification of the regulations "in the direction of further strengthening of small Polish stores".
-
FOR Communication 13/2019: Less freedom by weakening the rule of law - Poland in the Human Freedom Index | 2019-04-11
moreIn the latest edition of the Human Freedom Index 2018, which covers the first year of the rule of the Law and Justice party, Poland ranked 39th out of 162 countries with a score of 7.81 points. The deterioration of the personal liberty rate, to a large extent including the level of the rule of law, is responsible for most of this decline.
-
FOR Communication 12/2019: Who is going to pay for Kaczyński’s Five? | 2019-04-04
moreThe Law and Justice (PiS) party’s new election promises of, namely, the “Kaczyński Five”, will cost the Polish public finances PLN 40 billion per year . In addition, the Law and Justice (PiS) party passed a resolution on the increase in a number of expenditures for the following years, mainly on health care and the army. The implementation of the “Kaczyński Five”, similarly to the PiS election promises of 2015, will force the government to relatively reduce expenditures for other purposes, raise taxes, and increase the deficit.
-
FOR Communication 11/2019: Entrepreneurs’ test - more power in the hands of bureaucrats | 2019-03-29
moreThe introduction of the entrepreneurs' test is not a reform, but an attempt to find additional tax revenues needed to finance Morawski's Five. Giving bureaucrats the right to decide who can use the 19% PIT and who is to pay the full 40% PIT and ZUS contributions will be another source of conflict between the administration and taxpayers.
-
FOR Communication 10/2019: Polish rule of law before the European Court of Justice: reflections after the hearing on the Disciplinary Chamber and the new National Council of the Judiciary [NCJ] | 2019-03-26
moreIs the Disciplinary Chamber an independent court since it was fully formed by the new National Council of the Judiciary, mostly elected by politicians? Such a question from the Supreme Court came before the EU Court of Justice at its hearing in Luxembourg on Tuesday. The procedural nature of the case and the arguments raised during the hearing, as well as the expected decision of the Constitutional Tribunal seem to suggest that the final decision may (at least partially) contribute to limiting the influence of politicians on the Polish justice system.